Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3

...

  1. Establish documentation timetables as offsets to Release Dates, for each deliverable or assignment
    1. Begin user documentation
      1. Sketch outlines: develop in tandem once specs 50% complete
      2. Sketch content: Spec completion/signoff + 1 week
      3. Drafting content: in tandem with code/development and iterative code reviews; should be able to complete outline and some content
    2. Draft #1 user Documentation: within 2 weeks of sprint release for coded feature
    3. Draft #2 user documentation: Within 2 weeks after release of final code for features, or Release overall
    4. Format Review copies due: Draft #2 date + 2weeks (time consuming)
    5. Initial QA Review due: Format Review Date + 1 week
    6. Final due: Initial QA date + 2 weeks
    7. Publish due: Final date + 1-2 weeks
  2. Add 10% +  contingency to Draft #2/Format Review dates (ie, some code won't won’t be completed until just before release)
  3. Create Documentation calendar for each Release, with above offsets for global release
    1. Publish within 2-10 weeks of Release date (TBD with PM, depending on type of release, complexity, available resources)
  4. Coordinate schedule with Sprint Releases, and most current Milestone or Product Release schedules
    1. what are expectations for support, technical or user documentation:
      1. Snapshots: code only iterative/timely releases (biweekly sprints or future iterations, like 1.1, 1.1.1 etc)
      2. Milestone Releases: like OLE 0.3, 0.6, 0.8?
      3. Product Releases: like OLE 1.0, OLE 1.5, OLE 2.0 etc
  5. Monitor final code-promotion timetable to DEMO environment to determine when code for release is locked, and also when environments might be down
  6. Publish and communicate when servers are offline (maintenance, upgrades, refreshes, code promotions) and share with Writers- as they cannot access during those times for Screen Captures, etc.
    1. Suggestion: While we may wish to maintain separate KIS groups/lists/emails for SME Teams, vs Testers Team, vs User Documentation Team, why not build a distribution-only list for system outages or whenever DEV, TST, or DEMO go up/down? Could include SME team analysts, FC leads, TC leads, writers/User doc leads etc-- to convey system messages?

...

  1. Garner support and SMEs via Tiger/SME Teams or thru Functional Council as additional resources for initial efforts
  2. Identify documentation lead per module
  3. Identify documentation team per module- existing, past, or current features (ideally a rep from each spec team, or testers)
  4. Like "testers"“testers”, add documentation rep as assignment to each spec handoff, and begin integrating into code review meetings with SME teams
  5. Regular meetings and training
    1. Allow each module to have own meetings, organization, manage assignment
    2. Monthly meetings at beginning of release for "touch base" “touch base” with all writers/all modules
    3. Bi-weekly documentation meetings (across all modules, and leads) in 1 month before release, and 2 months after release up to publishing date
  6. Create sandbox for shared documents (schedules, training material, templates, and sandboxes for each module's module’s user documentation drafts)
  7. Training (how to, templates, best practices, checklists)

V. Training

  1. Don't Don’t leave to last minute!
  2. Solicit help from other SMEs & manage mini writing assignments where helpful!
  3. Document Templates
    1. Publish format templates to sandbox
    2. Publish plain text with outline headings to sandbox
    3. Writers: plain text, and import to templates?
  4. Documentation Checklist: Content (bugs, fixes, new code, new screenshots, etc)
  5. Documentation Checklist: QA (overall)
  6. Documentation Checklist (Nora): Publishing
  7. Common glossary for documentation usage:
    1. 3rd person/you vs generic user, etc.
    2. User vs Staff vs. Operator (libraries have indicated their vernacular for "user" means patrons of library/users of library public catalog
    3. Other, esp OLE -defined terms and use of Document Store/DocStore; OLE Instance; OLE Holding vs Source Holding
  8. Links and usage of common elements documentation- do not include in every user guide, but provide hyperlinks to common/shared Glossary, Rice terms, Edoc elements, common actions/buttons, etc.
  9. Use of Sandbox, doc versioning, Track Changes
  10. Gliffy Sandbox: open-source modeling tool (like Visio!) for sharing and creating workflows, dataflows, or org chart models. Checkc out the OLE Gliffy Sandbox Instructions

...