User Documentation Planning
Below is draft planning outline for approval. Teams, schedule and approach TBD.
I. Overview
- OLE requires committed SMEs to complete User Documentation for all modules and all features delivered in the application, leveraging those SMEs with knowledge of the specifications, iterative code-reviews, and user-testing.
- Training, checklists, and best practices will be shared among all Module SME team representatives, and the to-be-formed User Documentation team.
- User Documentation should be developed in tandem with release, and completion should closely follow a scheduled milestone or product release (see timelines-with some variation for milestone releases, depending on FC/PM decisions for support, schedule)-- progressive completions in tandem with coded features.
Item |
Purpose |
Audience |
Owner |
SME Contact |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overviews / |
Broad overviews explaining the features of each module. Provides notation for where users can customize (Think story format; descriptions of how to do library tasks and overviews of each module) |
All users of the software: |
Nora |
One per module |
Jira passed to SMEs; due 1/31/2013 |
Technical Documentation |
Provide information about the technical processes of OLE. |
Library IT |
HTC |
Technical Council? |
Do we have someone specific leading this? |
Release Documentation |
Provide detailed information about the changes and/or enhancements of each release of OLE. (Think what has changed; how it has changed. This will be a basic technical overview for functional users and SHORT!) |
All users of the software: |
Nora? |
|
|
Online Help and "Big Book of OLE" |
First line of reference when users have a question as they're using software. Provide look-up within the OLE system and details of the functions available within OLE. This will be very detailed and contain explanations of each OLE screens. |
All users of the software: |
Jain? |
Same SMEs as for Overview Documentation |
Working to determine which online help product to use. Continuing on the Big Book |
Start-up guide |
Provide instructions for how to set up and configure OLE. (Import patrons, bib data; set up chart of accounts, etc.) |
All users of the software: |
Technical Council? |
|
Kathy started CoA, already in Google Docs; Documentation in planning |
* Taken from https://wiki.kuali.org/display/KULRICE/Documentation+Policy
II. Outline: Content & Teams
- For the Overview Documents, each Jira has an attached outline.
- For the Big Book, the outline is below files in the User Documentation Sandbox
III. Timeline
- Establish documentation timetables as offsets to Release Dates, for each deliverable or assignment
- Begin user documentation
- Sketch outlines: develop in tandem once specs 50% complete
- Sketch content: Spec completion/signoff + 1 week
- Drafting content: in tandem with code/development and iterative code reviews; should be able to complete outline and some content
- Draft #1 user Documentation: within 2 weeks of sprint release for coded feature
- Draft #2 user documentation: Within 2 weeks after release of final code for features, or Release overall
- Format Review copies due: Draft #2 date + 2weeks (time consuming)
- Initial QA Review due: Format Review Date + 1 week
- Final due: Initial QA date + 2 weeks
- Publish due: Final date + 1-2 weeks
- Begin user documentation
- Add 10% + contingency to Draft #2/Format Review dates (ie, some code won’t be completed until just before release)
- Create Documentation calendar for each Release, with above offsets for global release
- Publish within 2-10 weeks of Release date (TBD with PM, depending on type of release, complexity, available resources)
- Coordinate schedule with Sprint Releases, and most current Milestone or Product Release schedules
- what are expectations for support, technical or user documentation:
- Snapshots: code only iterative/timely releases (biweekly sprints or future iterations, like 1.1, 1.1.1 etc)
- Milestone Releases: like OLE 0.3, 0.6, 0.8?
- Product Releases: like OLE 1.0, OLE 1.5, OLE 2.0 etc
- what are expectations for support, technical or user documentation:
- Monitor final code-promotion timetable to DEMO environment to determine when code for release is locked, and also when environments might be down
- Publish and communicate when servers are offline (maintenance, upgrades, refreshes, code promotions) and share with Writers- as they cannot access during those times for Screen Captures, etc.
- Suggestion: While we may wish to maintain separate KIS groups/lists/emails for SME Teams, vs Testers Team, vs User Documentation Team, why not build a distribution-only list for system outages or whenever DEV, TST, or DEMO go up/down? Could include SME team analysts, FC leads, TC leads, writers/User doc leads etc-- to convey system messages?
IV. Resources
- Garner support and SMEs via Tiger/SME Teams or thru Functional Council as additional resources for initial efforts
- Identify documentation lead per module
- Identify documentation team per module- existing, past, or current features (ideally a rep from each spec team, or testers)
- Like “testers”, add documentation rep as assignment to each spec handoff, and begin integrating into code review meetings with SME teams
- Regular meetings and training
- Allow each module to have own meetings, organization, manage assignment
- Monthly meetings at beginning of release for “touch base” with all writers/all modules
- Bi-weekly documentation meetings (across all modules, and leads) in 1 month before release, and 2 months after release up to publishing date
- Create sandbox for shared documents (schedules, training material, templates, and sandboxes for each module’s user documentation drafts)
- Training (how to, templates, best practices, checklists)
V. Training
- Don’t leave to last minute!
- Solicit help from other SMEs & manage mini writing assignments where helpful!
- Document Templates
- Publish format templates to sandbox
- Publish plain text with outline headings to sandbox
- Writers: plain text, and import to templates?
- Documentation Checklist: Content (bugs, fixes, new code, new screenshots, etc)
- Documentation Checklist: QA (overall)
- Documentation Checklist (Nora): Publishing
- Common glossary for documentation usage:
- 3rd person/you vs generic user, etc.
- User vs Staff vs. Operator (libraries have indicated their vernacular for "user" means patrons of library/users of library public catalog
- Other, esp OLE -defined terms and use of Document Store/DocStore; OLE Instance; OLE Holding vs Source Holding
- Links and usage of common elements documentation- do not include in every user guide, but provide hyperlinks to common/shared Glossary, Rice terms, Edoc elements, common actions/buttons, etc.
- Use of Sandbox, doc versioning, Track Changes
- Gliffy Sandbox: open-source modeling tool (like Visio!) for sharing and creating workflows, dataflows, or org chart models. Checkc out the OLE Gliffy Sandbox Instructions
VI. Quality Assurance & Review
- Draft Review Process (Content Completion)
- Format Review Process (QA in Template, continue edits)
- Quality Review Process (language, uniformity, standards, link checking)
- Final Approval Doc Review (all edits via redline or plain text substitutions; single doc owners for incorporating all edits)
VII. Publishing
- (Future) DocBooks
- Version Control
VIII. Maintenance
- Future Coding/Deliverables added
- Feature Enhancements
- Documentation Improvements (format, indexing, maximizing Adobe PDF outlining/indexing)
- Online Help
- Archiving between releases
Operated as a Community Resource by the Open Library Foundation