Page Comparison

Under Construction. To be updated to reflect new OLE Development Process.

  

{note}Under Construction. To be updated to reflect new OLE Development Process.{note}
The goal of the checklist, when complete, is to guide the overall specification process: from initial User Requirements with Spec teams full circle through testing, and any iterative gap analysis.  SME Teams and the Project Team may utilize this to manage processes and workflows around spec-writing (optional tool for managing work and spec progress by SA/SME Team Systems Analyst).

h3. Goals/Objectives

The following is a detailed checklist for completing functional specifications, to ensure completeness of documentation, and full understanding of library requirements for:

# Functionality/functional overview
# Workflows
# Data elements, data flows
# Permissions
# Business Rules/Parameters
# E-doc Routing or approvals/Workflow
# KRMS/ advanced business rules
# Acceptance criteria and testing scripts
# User interface wireframes, navigation
# Search


h3. *Deliverables*

The specific deliverables expected of functional spec teams are:
# Develop...
# Document ...
# Test ...
# Communicate...
#  

h3. Timeline

|| Phase || Tasks || Assigned to: || Start Date || Due Date || Status ||
| Phase 1 - Planning | Task 1 - Organize Team / Meetings | | | | |
| | Task 2 \- Identify Goals / Deliverables | | | | |
| | Task 3 - Establish Timelines | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Phase 2 - Drafting | Task 1 - Research / Analyze | | | | |
| | Task 2 - Write / Document | | | | |
| | Task 3 - Develop / Acceptance Criteria | | | | |
| | Task 4\- List/define data elements | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Phase 3 - Reviewing | Task 1 - Present / Communicate | | | | |
| | Task 2 - Implement / System Test | | | | |
| | Task 3 - | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Final Phase\- Deliverable Package | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |

h3.


h2.
{tasklist:Spec Checklist|width=90%}
||Completed||Priority||Locked||CreatedDate||CompletedDate||Assignee||Name||
|F|M|F|          |          |chris.case|(check)	Completing Functional Specs	Status	Roadblocks	Notes|
|F|M|F|          |          |nroggeve|Preparation|
|F|M|F|          |          |nroggeve|1. Roadmap to user stories (scope team)|
|F|M|F|          |          | |2. Team formed (SME Team drafts)|
|F|M|F|          |          | |3. SOW prepared-|
|F|M|F|          |          | |a.  how we're changing this process in OLE;|
|F|M|F|          |          | |b. limits or dependencies for current task|
|F|M|F|          |          | |c. timeline/due dates|
|F|M|F|          |          | |4. user stories prepared for spec team|
|F|M|F|          |          | |5. Spec team onboarding|
|F|M|F|          |          | |6. Critical dependencies, building blocks, rice services begun to be identified (SME Team-TC+analyst+core)|
|F|M|F|          |          | |Spec Kickoff|
|F|M|F|          |          | |1. Share above and reference documents|
|F|M|F|          |          | |2. Demo relevant to-date-coding for task|
|F|M|F|          |          | |3. Intro to tools|
|F|M|F|          |          | |4. Spec team lead w/ SME Team  analyst support to lead|
|F|M|F|          |          | |5. TC in 1st call- begin drafting list APIs, technical challenges or required investigations|
|F|M|F|          |          | |6. Review, extend SOW|
|F|M|F|          |          | |7. Evaluation of user stories assigned- into critical or linear path: discussion|
|F|M|F|          |          | |8. Divide-and-conquer: assignments, due dates|
|F|M|F|          |          | |9.  |
|F|M|F|          |          | |Spec-writing|
|F|M|F|          |          | |1. Draft narratives|
|F|M|F|          |          | |2. Define glossary of library terms used in narratives|
|F|M|F|          |          | |3. List and define data elements and attributes in worksheet template|
|F|M|F|          |          | |4. List key workflows and alternate paths|
|F|M|F|          |          | |5. Annotate critical business rules|
|F|M|F|          |          | |6. User roles and permissions (access)|
|F|M|F|          |          | |7. Approval process (routing)|
|F|M|F|          |          | |8. Wireframes, UI|
|F|M|F|          |          | |a. Balsamiq|
|F|M|F|          |          | |b. Templates TBD|
|F|M|F|          |          | |c. IU UX|
|F|M|F|          |          | |d. F2F workshops|
|F|M|F|          |          | |9. Acceptance criteria (simple)|
|F|M|F|          |          | |Next steps;|
|F|M|F|          |          | |1. specs translated to jira tasks/tickets|
|F|M|F|          |          | |2. key parts of specs into technical documents|
|F|M|F|          |          | |3. SME team review of specs|
|F|M|F|          |          | |a. Out of scope|
|F|M|F|          |          | |b. Remaining questions|
|F|M|F|          |          | |c. General agreement|
|F|M|F|          |          | |4. SME Team analyst leads spec completion with help from core team|
|F|M|F|          |          | |5. Test scripts authoring begun|
|F|M|F|          |          | |6. SME Team, TC reevaluates for APIs, technical integrations- writes specs on technical gaps|
|F|M|F|          |          | |7. Documentation/translations made available to spec, SME, project team- any/all review or comments|
|F|M|F|          |          | |Developer Handoff|
|F|M|F|          |          | |1. review technical specs and reference materials|
|F|M|F|          |          | |2. update or clarify jira|
|F|M|F|          |          | |3. Coding|
|F|M|F|          |          | |Iterative review|
|F|M|F|          |          | |1. Coding begun, iterative clarifications (HTC, analyst)|
|F|M|F|          |          | |2. 50% code review with spec team|
|F|M|F|          |          | |3. Code complete-|
|F|M|F|          |          | |a. Offshore handoff to onshore lead|
|F|M|F|          |          | |b. Onshore review and move to testing|
|F|M|F|          |          | |c. Technical testing- core team|
|F|M|F|          |          | |d. User testing|
|F|M|F|          |          | |        i.    Scripts|
|F|M|F|          |          | |       ii.    Gap analysis vs good enough|
|F|M|F|          |          | |      iii.    Enhancements and bug-fixes into jira|
|F|M|F|          |          | |SME Team quarterly review|
|F|M|F|          |          | |1. Open, new jira|
|F|M|F|          |          | |2. Out-of-scopes|
|F|M|F|          |          | |3. Gap analysis|
|F|M|F|          |          | |4. prioritization|
{tasklist}