Order of 264 subfields a and b in MARC not reflected in VuFind display

Description

The MARC standard says that subfields ‘a' and ‘b' of a 264 are repeatable fields. When they are in the MARC field as:

  • $a1 : $b1 ; $a2 : $b2

image-20250403-191612.png

…they are displayed as:

  • $a1 : $a2 : $b1 ; $b2

image-20250403-191659.png

The loop that processes the subfields does not keep track of the order in which the subfields appeared in the MARC field.

Environment

None

Attachments

2
  • 03 Apr 2025, 07:17 PM
  • 03 Apr 2025, 07:17 PM

Activity

Show:

Peter Murray last week

Ah, good point, yes. I hadn’t thought of the broader picture.

Demian Katz last week

, I don’t think the loop is to blame so much as the whole model used by VuFind. The record driver has separate methods for getting a list of places of publication, and a list of publishers. It has no explicit mechanism for correlating these elements, so it just lists all of the places followed by all of the publishers. I think we would need to come up with a whole different abstraction to make this work in the desired way. See the getPlacesOfPublication() and getPublishers() methods for more details.

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Components

Affects versions

Priority

Created last week
Updated last week

Flag notifications