Page Comparison

...

Team pages for roles and responsibilities with Development Process Model are being updated and reformatted.

Section

Column

width	50%

Panel

borderColor	#A40000
bgColor	#F8F8F8
titleBGColor	#E8E8E8
title	Contents
borderStyle	dashed

Table of Contents

minLevel	1
outline	false

See below linked document and detailed task assignments that reflect the roles and responsibilities of SME Teams in the OLE Development Process.

HTML Comment
https://docs.google.com/a/kuali.org/document/d/1ybw-WwuGdFhvUDlbha1BVNnaTFObWEbLNYzHqui4MIQ/edit?hl=en_US

" mce_href="https://docs.google.com/a/kuali.org/document/d/1ybw-WwuGdFhvUDlbha1BVNnaTFObWEbLNYzHqui4MIQ/edit?hl=en_US" target="_Blank">Draft Development Cycle - Narrative Description, 1/6/2012</A>{html} *

Column

SME Teams	Leads
Acquisitions/Financial:

Select

&

Acquire Tiger Team (C Ruschoff) * Cataloging: Describe-Manage Tiger Team (M Charbonneau) * Circulation: Deliver Tiger Team (R Schipper) * ERMS: Manage-Entity-Relationship Tiger Team (T McGeary) * Implementations/Technical: Systems Integration Tiger Team (M Tamarkin) * Identity Management: Manage-User-Relationships Tiger Team (F McNamara) * Subscriptions project: GoKB (K Antelman) * Roadmap Development/Scope Decisions: Scope Tiger Team (T McGeary)  h2. Task Assignments *PRIORITIZATION*\- Tiger Teams # (2)-assign stories to Roadmap ## Identify key user stories that match up to each Roadmap bulleted task or deliverable. ## Update working Roadmaps with matching user stories for each "Work Package", with Jira numbers, who assigned to, and due dates/progress. ###

Acquire	S Wiles-Young
Cataloging: Describe-Manage	M & G Charbonneau
Circulation: Deliver	E Batista
Implementations/Technical: Systems Integration	P Subrahmanya
Subscriptions project: GoKB	K Antelman

Task Assignments

Section

Column

width	75%

(see the draft development cycle and approach page for further details)

Prioritization - SME Teams

(2) -assign stories to Roadmap
1. Identify key user stories that match up to each Roadmap bulleted task or deliverable.
2. Update working Roadmaps with matching user stories for each "Work Package", with Jira numbers, who assigned to, and due dates/progress.
  1. Wiki Markup
    {html}<A href="https://docs.google.com/a/kuali.org/

spreadsheet/ccc

1. 1. leaf?

key

1. 1. id=

0ApyHKv6I9MPFdFh3ZlIyZllrNjNxY1FUZTJTbFQ1Q2c

1. 1. 0ByXT6YhAHSXFM0xxZ2djd1lSV2s &hl=en_

US#gid=0

US\\
 " mce_href="https://docs.google.com/a/kuali.org/

spreadsheet/ccc

1. 1. leaf?

key

1. 1. id=

0ApyHKv6I9MPFdFh3ZlIyZllrNjNxY1FUZTJTbFQ1Q2c

1. 1. 0ByXT6YhAHSXFM0xxZ2djd1lSV2s &hl=en_

US#gid=0

1. 1. US\\ " target="_Blank"

><strong>Working

1. 1. >OLE

OLE

1. 1. SCOPE

0.6 Timeline</strong><

1. 1. AND SCHEDULE-COPY</A>{html}

### {html}<A href="

1. 2. HTML Comment
    https://docs.google.com/a/kuali.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=

0AuB_LtZjzdSedG9kRVB5Z1laTEMzc1RIWTFBam5NMXc

1. 1. 0ApyHKv6I9MPFdFh3ZlIyZllrNjNxY1FUZTJTbFQ1Q2c&hl=en_US#gid=0

" mce_href="

1. 2. HTML Comment
    https://docs.google.com/a/kuali.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuB_LtZjzdSedG9kRVB5Z1laTEMzc1RIWTFBam5NMXc&hl=en_US#gid=0

" target="_Blank"><strong>Working OLE 0.8 Timeline</strong></A>{html} ###

1. 2. (OLE

1. 1. 1.0

1. 1. Timeline

1. 1. coming

1. 1. soon)

##

2. Determine

1. white-paper/research

1. needs

1. and

1. teams,

1. versus

1. spec

1. writing

1. needs/teams.

#

(3)

\

-

Prioritize

Stories

##

1. Use

1. Roadmap

1. or

1. other

1. brainstorming

1. for

1. identifying

1. "Critical

1. functionality"

1. to

1. prioritize

1. efforts

1. and

1. teams.

##

2. Plan

1. assignments,

1. and

1. maintain

1. organization

1. on

1. their

1. status,

1. for

1. eventual

1. updates

1. to

1. Timeline

1. worksheets

1. and

1. Spec

1. inventory

1. in

1. Jira

1. (specs

1. in

1. progress,

1. spec

1. inventory,

1. final

1. specs,

1. coding,

1. etc).

##

2. As

1. stories

1. are

1. annotated,

1. Jira

1. will

1. need

1. to

1. be

1. updated

1. with

1. most

1. current,

1. governed

1. list

1. of

1. stories

1. by the Project Team (new

1. stories;

1. duplicates;

1. one

1. spec

1. for

1. multiple

1. stories;

1. etc).

#

(4)

\

-

Assign

stories

and

deadlines

to

teams

##

1. Solicit

1. SMEs

1. to

1. complete

1. above

1. work

## [

2. Draft

1. SOW

|Specification & Documentation Templates#sow] 

1. (see

1. template)

\

1. -

1. Statement

1. of

1. Work

1. for

1. each

1. spec

1. team,

1. to

1. guide

1. efforts,

1. identify

1. story

1. goals

1. or

1. boundaries

1. of

1. the

1. effort,

1. what

1. may

1. be

1. future

1. or

1. out

1. of

1. scope

1. (if

1. known),

1. and

1. any

1. known

precursors ## Tiger Team to assist Tiger Team System Analyst as needed to organize and kickoff each spec team. ## SA, Carla

1. precursors
2. SME Team to assist Team System Analyst as needed to organize and kickoff each spec team.
3. SA, Carla (cnorth@indiana.edu)

1. or

1. Nora

1. (nroggeve@indiana.edu)

1. can

1. assist

1. in

1. updating

1. Jira

1. with

1. known

1. spec

1. statuses

1. and

1. any

1. new

1. tasks

1. or

1. stories.

(8)

\-*REVIEW\-* Tiger Team

Review - SME Team

(see:

[

Specification

&

Documentation

Templates] for TT role in Review of Document) # Review and approve specs # Finalize or add Acceptance Criteria\- what and how? # Note anything out of scope # Meet with PM to help determine prioritization # Sample data needs identified\- given to SA and TC # Sample technical integration points culled by TC (ie for APIs, other tech specs needed) # Update Jira with "spec inventory" (with SA, Carla, or Nora). (12), (17)\- *HANDOFFS & REVIEWS* # Participate in handoffs to developers as requested. # Make decisions on scope creep or other Q&A as required by SA and Core Team. # Gap analysis as below. (23),

Templates - Not sure (Archive?) for SME Team role in Review of Document)

Review and approve specs: are they complete and in approved fSpec template?
Are data needs annotated and complete in approved Data Requirements template?
Finalize or add Acceptance Criteria - what and how?
Note anything out of scope
Meet with PM to help determine prioritization (if not in schedule)
Sample data needs identified (ie, test data) - given to SA and TC
Sample technical integration points culled by TC (ie for APIs, other tech specs needed)
Upload specs to jira, updating workflow, and send email to Project Manager and Business Analyst (SA can complete this)

(12), (17) Handoffs and Reviews

Participate in handoffs to developers as requested.
Make decisions on scope creep or other Q&A as required by SA and Project Team.
Gap analysis as below.

(23), (25)-(26)

TESTING

Testing:

Spec

Team,

Tiger

SME Team,

QA

Manager

#

Identify

testing

SMEs

as

required

and

assign

to

efforts.

#

Participate

in

Acceptance

Testing

as

requested.

#

Gap

Analysis

as

below.

{anchor:gap}

Anchor
gap
gap

(iterative)

*

Gap

Analysis

*

:

Tiger Team  #

SME Team

Specs (8):

  ## Review specs for identifiable gaps or completeness. ## Remove or note any items "out of scope". ## Create new user stories or assign specs in reprioritization efforts when gaps identified as part of initial spec writing. # Codeable Specs (11): ## Repeat above reviews as requested, when Core Team identifies variations in

1. Review specs for identifiable gaps or completeness.
2. Remove or note any items "out of scope".
3. Create new user stories or assign specs in re-prioritization efforts when gaps identified as part of initial spec writing.
Codeable Specs (11):
1. Repeat above reviews as requested, when Project Team identifies variations in "specs-to-coding"

1. due

1. to

1. time

1. or

1. technology

1. constraints.

#

Testing

(23),

(25),

(26):

##

1. Organize

1. and

1. Annotate

1. Gap

1. Analysis

1. with

1. SA

1. as

1. Testers

1. or

1. Spec

1. Teams

1. identify

1. known

1. gaps

1. in

1. coded

1. product.

##

2. Re-prioritize

1. items

1. that

1. have

1. fallen

1. out

1. of

1. coding

1. in

1. current

1. releases

1. for

1. inclusion

1. in

1. future

1. releases.

#

Iterative

Gap

Analysis

(from

coding-begin

to

Acceptance):

## Tiger Team is to manage overall gap analysis as part of iterative design process. ## Core Team & SA are responsible for communicating gaps during coding as a result of technology constraints, so Tiger Team can reprioritize or SA can discuss with Spec Team. ## General oversight

1. SME Team is to manage overall gap analysis as part of iterative design process.
2. Project Team & SA are responsible for communicating gaps during coding as a result of technology constraints, so SME Team can re-prioritize or SA can discuss with Spec Team.
3. General oversight

Column

HTML Table

border	0

Table Row (tr)

Table Cell (td)

align	right

Phases:

For the complete model, see
OLE Development Cycle

Spec Writing

Table Cell (td)

align	right

Image Added

Table Row (tr)

Table Cell (td)

align	right

Coding

Table Cell (td)

align	right

Image Added

Table Row (tr)

Table Cell (td)

align	right

Testing

Table Cell (td)

align	right

Image Added

Table Row (tr)

Version	Old Version 23	New Version Current
Changes made by	Kathleen Gerdink (Unlicensed)	Nora Roggeveen-Sams (Unlicensed)
Saved on	Feb 07, 2012	Sept 16, 2014

Versions Compared

Key

Task Assignments

Prioritization - SME Teams

(8)

Review - SME Team

(12), (17) Handoffs and Reviews

(23), (25)-(26)

Testing:

Spec

Team,

SME Team,

QA

Manager

(iterative)

Gap

Analysis

:

SME Team