Page Comparison

ISSN

022 - a,z (MV)

first value

all values

same as search field

ISBN

020 - a,z (MV)

first value

all values

same as search field

Author/Creator

For each 100, 110: every subf except $6 (gives us 2 values for every tag). Also every subf except $t for: 111, 700, 710, 711, 800, 810, 811, 400, 410, 411) (MV)

first non-empty value of 100$a or 110$a etc

all values

same as short display value

Title

245 - all subf exc. c and 6. Also, 130, 240, 246, 247, 440, 490, 730, 740, 773, 774, 780, 785, 830, 840) (MV)

245$a and 245$b

all values

Place of Publication

260 - a (MV)

first value

all values

same as search field

Description

505 - a (MV)
KG/LR: UPenn just included the MARC 505 in its Description index (which is distinct from its Format/Description index). Include just 505 $a.  The SMEs may want additional 5xx fields in the Description index, but 505 should be fine for November.

first value

all values

same as search field

Subject

600, 610, 611, 630, 650, 651, 653, 69X: every subf exc. $6 across these tags (MV)
No hyphens for X00, X10, and X11 fields (600, 610, 611, 700, 710, 711, etc), but hyphens for other fields.

first non-empty value of 600$a, 610$a etc

all values

same as short display value

Date of Publication

<marc:controlfield tag="008">[Date 1 in the 7-10 positions LR: Can also include 260 $c. (260-c is same as the value in control field. Use this if control field does not have pub date value.) (MV)

first value

all values

same as search field

Edition

250 - a,b (MV)

first value

all values

same as search field

Form/Genre

655 - a, v (MV)

first value

all values

same as search field

Language

<marc:controlfield tag="008">[language code in the 35-37 positions]</marc:controlfield> LR: Add 546 $a (MV)
Language Codes

all values

all values

same as search field

Format

856 - q
245 - h  

LR: Format is very tricky b/c many MARC fields/subfields can be used to determine format.  

I think we could also consider adding the following:

Leader 06/07 – these are Type of Record and Bibliographic Material – each is a single letter characters and when combined, they seem to map to the UPenn bib_format field.  (See the worksheet now named Format – marc)
007 Physical Description Fixed Field-General Information – the character positions indicate physical format information.  See [http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd007.html
] 655 $a, $v (Genre/Form)
300 $e, $3 (Extent: Accompanying Material, Materials specified)
337 $a (Media Type)
338 $a (Carrier Type)
340 $a, $e, $m, $3 (Physical Medium: Material base, support, book format, materials specified)
Possibly other 3XX fields/subfields.

In the end, we may want to just touch base with some SMEs (Gwyneth? Bob? Stuart) to determine specifically what we could/should include)
(MV)

first value

all values

same as search field

Author

<dc:creator> (MV)

<dcvalue element="contributor" qualifier="author">

first value

all values

same as search field

Description

<dc:description> (MV)
Per Bob P.: Show only <dc:description>.

Per Bob P.:  Do not show Abstract description.
[show blank]

first value

all values

same as search field

Language

<dc:language>  (MV)
Language Codes

<dcvalue element="language" qualifier="iso">en_US</dcvalue>
Language Codes

first value

all values

same as search field

Subject

<dc:subject> (MV)

<dcvalue element="subject" qualifier="none">

first value

all values

same as search field

Title

<dc:title>

<dcvalue element="title" qualifier="none">

first value

all values

same as search field

Type

<dc:type> (MV)

<dcvalue element="type" qualifier="none">

first value

all values

same as search field

Date of Publication

<dc:date>

<dcvalue element="date" qualifier="issued">

first value

all values

same as search field

Format

<dc:format> (MV)

<dcvalue element="type" (This is covered in a separate field. So do not include it in Format)
<dcvalue element="format" qualifier="mimetype">

??? (LR: In looking back at the MARC to Qualified DC mapping it is not entirely clear, but it should be both the  format and type elements.

first value

all values

same as search field

Publisher

<dc:publisher> (MV)

<dcvalue element="publisher"

??? (KG/LR: publisher.  It doesn't appear in the crosswalk, but that could be that the UMD dataset did not include that tag)

first value

all values

same as search field

ISBN/ISSN/other

<dc:identifier>(ISSN)0198-9669</dc:identifier>  (MV)
 <dc:identifier>(ISBN)0306710382</dc:identifier> (MV)

<dcvalue element="identifier" qualifier="isbn">0-918006-48-1</dcvalue>

first value

all values

same as search field